

๐๐ฎ๐๐ฆ๐ข๐ฌ๐ฌ๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐๐ฌ ๐ ๐ค๐ข๐ง๐ค ๐ฏ๐ฌ ๐ฌ๐ฎ๐๐ฆ๐ข๐ฌ๐ฌ๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐๐ฌ ๐ ๐ง๐๐ญ๐ฎ๐ซ๐๐ฅ ๐ซ๐๐ฌ๐ฉ๐จ๐ง๐ฌ๐
I see lots of people lost in the term submission. Itโs because we can perceive submission differently: 1) submission as a kink and 2) submission as a natural response. And these two types can even mingle, but donโt have to. โ๏ธ
-
Submission as a natural response is connected to selfless serving - provide, protect, please. It is far behind a kink, itโs more about general behaviour than sexual behaviour, about higher values as itโs manโs devotion to a woman and potentially a family, but also a general respect and appreciation for women. ๐ซโจ
-
On the other hand submission as a kink, is mostly about sexual behaviour and fulfilling YOUR needs and desires. Itโs conntected with BDSM and other kinks based on power exchange dynamics.
-
I believe that submission as a natural response should be rather called just a mission, devotion. Yes, a man in this case SUBmits to a woman, but he also might be perceived dominant by the rest of the world. There might even be different dynamics in the bedroom, where the woman can be submissive (or the segs doesnโt have to be kinky at all), but it doesnโt change the fact, that sheโs treated as the only queen by her man.
-
That means, that men can be kinky submissive, but not treat women as the queens (put themselves first, disrespect womenโs needs and wants, their boundaries, undervalue them, basically misogyny behaviour...) outside of their sexual imaginations, as well as men can treat women with respect and value them as divine creatures, without being submissive sexually.
-
So which of these are you or are you both? ๐ค